Jump to content

Talk:Republic of Singapore Navy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

LSTs

[edit]

The RSN calls them Landing Ship Tanks, so why should we call them by other names? I have seen the name changed at least twice! --Huaiwei 08:03, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I think the article classified the different types of ships generically. Whether tank landing ships (LSTs) or amphibious transport docks, it is all a matter of nomenclature. In fact, MINDEF has referred the "LSTs" as "helicopter landing ships", "landing ships" on numerous occasions in their official news releases [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
If you have read the article carefully, the Endurance class are really LPDs, with their helicopter landing ability and the ability to ballast and de-ballast to support landing craft or amphibious vehicles. --220.244.242.231 05:02, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit]

If I may quote from the copyright "disclaimer" in the associated images displayed on this page:

"The copyrights to this image are held by the Ministry of Defence, Singapore (MINDEF). As stated in its website, users may only download, reproduce or use this image strictly for non-commercial and personal purposes. Users are strictly prohibited from modifying, distributing, re-posting, "framing" or using this image for any public or commercial purpose including for sale, unless prior written permission is first obtained from MINDEF."

The copyright specifies that these materials or images may be used only on a non-commercial and personal basis. Wikipedia complies with the former perfectly well, but as a public domain website, it is far from being "personal". Displaying Mindef's pictures on an open website is not personal use, and is therefore a violation of copyright. These images will have to be removed unless direct permission is sought from Mindef. Better yet...lets take our own photos! :D--Huaiwei 09:36, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have a photo of the RSS Resilience. Anyone else in support of using this? The picture can be made smaller for the article.VK35 23:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow...quite a striking photo, but it may not fit into the box nicely due to its dimensions. Perhaps post it as a picture elsewhere in the article?--Huaiwei 16:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since there has been no objections so far, I've replaced the fair use photo with the above photo except I reduced the above photo's size.VK35 16:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos

[edit]

I have to add a little personal opinion here--I'm in the US Navy, have worked with the Singapore Navy, and find them one of the best and most professional forces. I realize that's not the point of Wikipedia or the discussion pages, but, well, had to throw that in. On a similar note, kudos to this article's writers. Very well written. --12.154.39.254 14:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

correction?

[edit]

Was there a delay in commissioning the RSS Formidable [[6]] versus the current article which says 2004?71.212.89.199 16:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Republic of Singapore Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:16, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Republic of Singapore Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Specialized Marine Craft Type-II

[edit]

Are there WP:RS on these stealth vessels? Presumably deliberately excluded from RSN website (or at least, I cannot find reference). [7] [8] [9] Davidships (talk) 11:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

[edit]

@Bakertheacre Hello. I note you have removed the flags from the infobox. I would like to point out that the US Navy and British Royal Navy pages both feature both Presidental (or Queen), Ensigns (no dispute there) and Naval Jacks (Britain has the same Jack as their national flag in their infoboxes. Therefore, I do believe they should remain in the infoboxes as I have always used these two pages as standards to measure up against. Unless there's something I am missing or we could remove the flags from those two pages as well, I would like to seek your concurrence to revert the edit. Seloloving (talk) 19:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missile Gunboat data

[edit]
Ships
  • RSS Sea Wolf (P76)—commissioned 1975
  • RSS Sea Lion (P77)—commissioned 1975
  • RSS Sea Dragon (P78)—commissioned 1975
  • RSS Sea Tiger (P79)—commissioned 1976
  • RSS Sea Hawk (P80)—commissioned 1976
  • RSS Sea Scorpion (P81)—commissioned 1976
RSS Sea Dragon docked at Changi Naval Base during the Navy Open House 2007
Length 45 metres
Beam 6.5 metres
Displacement 270 tonnes
Crew 40
Speed 30 knots (56 km/h)
Weapons

Infobox list

[edit]

@Sgweirdo: Please note that uncollapsing the list of engagements will cause the infobox section to move into the history section and displace the photos there. Where possible, the infobox should be kept neat and tidy, and as short as possible. The list of engagements should also follow the format of the lists above in the 'size' and 'ships' sections, which do not contain bullet points. They simply take up more room than necessary and causes the text to be displaced to the right. Seloloving (talk) 16:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Fleet (Republic of Singapore Navy)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fleet (Republic of Singapore Navy). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 18#Fleet (Republic of Singapore Navy) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seloloving (talk) 00:51, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Logged out edit

[edit]

I acknowledge that the last edit done on 19 November was by me. I was logged out and did not realise it.

INSTF (judging from the uploader of the previous image's Commons history and his obsession with the East Asian cultural thing) edited the original map (https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuas_maritime_dispute.png) to remove the original coastline of Singapore and failed to credit me for the revised version. (https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuas_dispute.png)

The original coastline is important as Singapore has always stated that we claim our territorial sea based on our original coast and not reclaimed land. The waters extending west of Tuas is hence based on Sultan Shoal, not the reclaimed land.

Just a heads-up to those who have dealt with him before. @Robertsky: @Justanothersgwikieditor: @Chipmunkdavis: I have been very busy with work and life has not settled down to a point where I am ready to resume editing anytime soon. Sincere apologies. Thank you for your assistance all these years. Seloloving (talk) 17:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, looks like it was hidden in this edit. CMD (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Republic_of_Singapore_Navy&oldid=1258762757"