Talk:Siphon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Siphon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11: 90 days

‹See TfM›

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Sediment#Dregs|dregs]] The anchor (#Dregs) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Confusion About Gravity

I'm confused why gravity alone couldn't just do the siphon effect. Let's think about it in two forms: We have a bowl, and we have a tube. We put water in each. The bowl is the control specimen. The tube is the experiment specimen. The shape of the water is different: gravity pulls the water down equally and creates a flat top of water in the bowl. If you tilt the bowl, the water stays flat on top, gravity pulling it down across the surface. It's normal behavior. Now imagine the water inside this tube. Luckily, it is in a U shape, so the water moved through the tube and forms a flat top... just like the bowl, just like gravity should. Now, if the water is not level, it moves to become level like normal: Here the water tries to make it's flat top due to gravity but oh no! at this point in time it is not equal, so just like the bowl, the water moves. The water is moving away from one end of the tube.... the air rushes in. The siphon is live. All thanks to gravity! BTW Pascal's bowl is just sitting there in another liquid, so gravity is just holding the flat top in the bowl. Pascal can use the tube shape, but it's still gravity flattening out the water due to gravity. Got it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.162.28.226 (talk) 02:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improper usage

A Google search reveals that siphon is occasionally substituted for search, browse, or rifle: “he quickly siphoned through the papers in the drawer.” This meaning is not found in any dictionary I have consulted, even as an alternate or rare definition. It might be useful to mention this misappropriation of the word.Roricka (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's odd. I have a feeling that those might just be mistakes rather than meaningful contributions, unless it's obvious that the ordinary meaning of "siphon" was intentionally being used (metaphorically) to describe someone's action.

Otherwise, I can just start saying "hat" when I mean "table", and the mere fact that I've done that will force everyone to document my new usage. :) TooManyFingers (talk) 18:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bubbles that "break" the siphon

In the section on using Bernoulli's equation, subsection "Maximum height", it says this:

if the bubbles enlarge to fill the pipe then the siphon will "break"

Which should it say: "fill the diameter of the pipe"? Or "fill the length of the pipe"? TooManyFingers (talk) 17:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How is Vb = Va in the siphon, in the Bernoulli section

How is Vb = Va in the siphon, in the Bernoulli section Apoorva210907 (talk) 15:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]