User talk:Fred J

This user may have left Wikipedia. Fred J has not edited Wikipedia since January 24, 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to my talk page. Place new posts at the foot of the page, please. Archive1 (February 2005–July 2005), Archive2 (July 2005–March 2006), Archive3 (April–June 2006), Archive4 (June–September, 2006), Archive5 (October-November, 2006) Archive Dec-06 Archive Dec-06 to May-07 Archive June-07 to June-08

Swedish heraldry

Fred J, thank you so much for your contributions to WP, such as your contributions to Swedish heraldry! I am working on expanding the article a bit, and I would greatly appreciate your help with finding appropriate sources for inline citations. If you can take a look at the article and add references for anything that sticks out to you, it would be a tremendous help. Tack så mycket! Wilhelm meis (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sundsvall.jpg

I have tagged Image:Sundsvall.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 16:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Wilhelm meis (talk) 00:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Grästorp_City_Arms.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Grästorp_City_Arms.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 23:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lidköping_symbol.png

I have tagged Image:Lidköping_symbol.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Lokal _Profil 23:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sundsvall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sundsvall.jpg. Unfortunately, I think that you have not provided a proper rationale for using this image under "fair use". Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.)

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 23:30, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 20:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lars Fredrik Nilson

Thanks for you´r help! Now it is much better and I will try to find a little bit more about his work!--Stone (talk) 05:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Raoul Wallenberg

As part of the WP:GA listing process, I have reviwed Raoul Wallenberg though I have also asked for a second opinion on if the article is correctly using WP:Summary Style and WP:Embedded Lists. However, there are some citation issues that still need to be fixed regardless of the outcome of the 2nd opinion, and some queries about entries in the honors/memorials section. Million_Moments (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK the second opinion agrees with the major edits that are needed. Normally an article is placed on hold if such edits can be made in a week. I'm going to ask you if you think the requested changes can be made in seven days or if you'd need more time than that, in which case the article would be failed and then you could re-nom it when it was done. I know you don't want to see the article failed, but I would have to do so if I judged it wasn't progressing well enough in seven days. Million_Moments (talk) 08:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied again on the review page. I believe the article is going in the right direction and can be completed in a week, of course the final decision is left to Million Moments. Check out the review page for more details. --Banime (talk) 13:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Nordic cinema task force

Hi. You may be interested in joining the new WP:Films task force which includes Finnish, Swedish, Norwegian, Icelandic and Danish film!! The Bald One ^{White cat} 17:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charles XI of Sweden

Hello, Fred J. I have listed the article as a GA since it satisfies Good article criteria. But however for a future FA status, this won't be enough. You'll have to add and expand more. Also a good copyeditor needs to copyedit this article. Anyway, good work. Hope to see this article as a featured article someday. Thanks, Kensplanet (talk) 07:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did like the article very much. Kensplanet (talk) 17:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emanuel Swedenborg

Hi Fred, I just noticed the last two changes about Swedenborg are vandelism. The word "gay" was added in two places, and I am unable to UNDO this for some reason. Can you UNDO these? Thanks in advance for your help. Stephen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sburleigh (talk • contribs) 03:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fred, OK I see that the person who added "gay" then immediately removed the word. So all is well with the Swedenborg article. Sorry for the confusion. Stephen Sburleigh Sburleigh (talk —Preceding undated comment was added at 13:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Image:National parks of Sweden numbers.png

Hi,

due to a software problem the following image which you uploaded was lost on Wikimedia Commons:

Image:National parks of Sweden numbers.png

I reset the image to a previous version. If you still have this file on your hard disk or if you can recover it from other sources please upload it again. If this image was transferred from a local Wikipedia to Wikimedia Commons it can be even recovered by an admin on the local Wikipedia.

Best regards, -- Ukko.de (talk) 14:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New image project

Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps invitation

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:13, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish heraldry source

Hello again! I am looking for a source on Swedish heraldry, and I'm not quite sure where to turn. I have found quite a few mentions in en.WP and sv.WP articles of a decision by the Privy Council in 1884 to grant Swedish provinces the rank of Duchy and the right to display the ducal coronet over the landskap arms. I see that at least some of these mentions were contributed by User:Mic, who seems to be long gone. I hope you have better access to sources than I do (since I am now in Japan) and the free time to look into it, or perhaps you know someone who can help. Any other contributions you can make to the article are always appreciated as well. Thank you! Wilhelm_meis (talk) 06:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment of Emanuel Swedenborg

I have done the GA Reassessment of Emanuel Swedenborg as part of the GA Sweeps project. I have found the article does not meet current GA Criteria. As such I have placed the article on hold pending work that needs to be done to bring it up to current standards. My review is here. I am notifying you as the primary editor of the possibility that the article will be delisted if work is not done in the next week. Please contact me on my talk page if you have any questions. H1nkles (talk) 16:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Swedish literature

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed at Talk:Swedish literature/GA1. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Knutsson (Bonde)

To demonstrate the validity of my claim that Charles VIII is better known, even in English-language sources, as Karl Knutsson (Bonde), please note the search results listed at Talk:Charles VIII of Sweden#Correct Name. Sources know him as Karl Knutsson over Charles at about a 6:1 ratio. Also, please feel free to explore the quality of search results, such as The Cambridge history of Scandinavia (p. 733) or The Catholic encyclopedia (p. 478). Encyclopedia and other reliable sources are split, and many acknowledge both names (as should we), but "Charles VIII" seems to mostly be a relatively recent trend, and Karl Knutsson (Bonde) avoids the problem of the conflicting ordinals. Wilhelm Meis (Quatsch!) 09:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive dedication, Wilhelm. I hope you didn't get the impression I disagreed with you because I didn't -- I just like references...

And I still find it important to cite a reference in the article when saying that he is "best known as Karl Knutsson Bonde"; and that such references should be added to ALL the royalties before Eric XIV at least; and it wouldn't hurt to add references to some monarchs after Eric either.

By looking at the logs, it doesn't appear the Charles VII was ever located at the name Karl Knutsson (Bonde). It should not be attributed to ignorance from the original author Mic, but probably just adherence to the original policy on royalties to name them with their ordinal number. Since that policy has changed for some cases, it should be uncontroversial to move the article to the name that the person is best known as, which is Bonde.

While Charles Bonde is uncontroversial, people such as Gustav I of Sweden are more difficult and it is necessary to have convincing sources before moving. I noticed you were involved in discussing the location of Eric of Pomerania too, which also is more controversial. Gustav I of Sweden has actually been located at a different location earlier but was moved because of aforementioned policy. [1]

Again, thanks for your interest in our monarchs.

Fred-J 19:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I spent a semester in the Stockholm area studying Swedish/Scandinavian history and culture. It certainly didn't make me an expert, but it did cultivate a respect for Scandinavian history. I agree about needing references. The thing that sparked my interest in how these articles are named was when I found that Eric of Pomerania had been moved to "Eric VII of Denmark" and some of the early Scandinavian kings I was familiar with by names such as "Eric Lamb" and "Eric Menved" were located at Eric III of Denmark and Eric VI of Denmark. Apparently I was mistaken about Karl Knutsson's article ever being at "Karl Knutsson (Bonde)", but I still think that would be the best name for him. I'm not a big fan of calling Karl "Charles", but I won't bat an eye if that's how he's known in most English-language sources. I just don't see it though. All my English-language books that discuss him call him either "Karl Knutsson" or "Karl Knutsson (Bonde)". It seems to me, and maybe you have a different perspective on this, but it seems to me that Gustav Vasa is so widely known as "Gustav Vasa" that it seems odd to drop the byname and adopt the ordinal. It seems to me that the Vasa name itself is quite notable, owing a great deal of its notability to the first king of independent Sweden. It seems to me that it would be rather like dropping Washington from George Washington (while the capital city and an entire state bear the name in his honor). Basically, I don't see the N-O-C convention as properly superceding the common name convention, just clarifying where the common name convention may be insufficient. Any time there is a clear common name, I think we should use it (though in the case of modern monarchs, the ordinals are in their common names). What do you think about it? Kind regards, Wilhelm Meis (Quatsch!) 03:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel Prize

Hello! I am currently working on the "Swedish Project" and "Award and Prizes"'s article Nobel Prize. Since it is a top importance article and not even GA class I am trying to make it a GA article and perhaps further after that. However, I'm in a state now where I could use some help. I need a new pair (several pairs in fact) of eyes to look at the article and the talk page for improving prose, debation of different things and some sourcing. Do you got any possibility to help out? BR --Esuzu 12:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esuzu (talk • contribs)

Hey, sounds great! It is currently undergoing GA review which I would be very happy to have some help with :) --Esuzu (talk • contribs) 18:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, no problem :) Thanks for your answer! --Esuzu (talk • contribs) 09:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Fred J! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Sven Nordqvist - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gunnel Linde - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bernd Spier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Johan Olov Wallin.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Johan Olov Wallin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolitan areas of Sweden listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Metropolitan areas of Sweden. Since you had some involvement with the Metropolitan areas of Sweden redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 02:37, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Floating front big.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Floating front big.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:18, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Piteå Rådhustorget.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Piteå Rådhustorget.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:58, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Piteå winter image.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Piteå winter image.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:59, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish heraldry FAC

I recently nominated Swedish heraldry for WP:FAC, and we need knowledgeable editors to comment on the article. Since you have been a contributor to that article, I hope you will take some time to look it over and leave your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Swedish heraldry/archive1. Thank you for your time and your contributions! Wilhelm Meis (Quatsch!) 14:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

From the Editor
What are You doing For Lent?
Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

File:Screenshot, music of ancien greece.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screenshot, music of ancien greece.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for consensus for editing Template:Catholicism

You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Catholicism#Edit_request_on_7_December_2012 to edit the list of Doctors of the Church to add John of Avila and Hildegard of Bingen and do this by embedding Template:Churchdoctor. I am messaging you because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Reptar.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Reptar.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heraldry and Vexillology project

Greetings! I have requested commentary from members of the heraldry and vexillology project at WT:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology#Current direction of the HV project. Please comment there. Thank you! Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 18:13, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)

Hi. I was wondering if you would be interested in contributing articles to Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic)? It needs contributors to increase diversity of content from different countries and bring about large scale improvements. The idea at some point will be to host a National Contest related to your country of interest. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Swedish star.png

The file File:Swedish star.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Johan Olof Wallin 2.jpg

The file File:Johan Olof Wallin 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Sweden/to do

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Talk:Sweden/to do requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kzkzb (talk) 17:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Swedish heraldry

Swedish heraldry has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]