User talk:TarmoK

Click OK

Can you find anything to add to Click OK article? --Easyas12c 08:55, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I corrected the song names

I emailed the photographer and asked him, if he was Interested in uploading

the image to Wikipedia (or any other which would be usefull).

If he would then ofcourse we would have the note of him being the photographer.

The link doesn't point directly to the image, but to his page where he can

promote him self, if he wishes. Even the image has his website url in it.

If he asks personally I still would note him on the Wikipedia page even, if

it's not ok by Wikipedia rules. Someone else could then remove it.

How ever he hasn't answered me anything.

I think it would be fair, if he uploaded an image and got credited of it.

I hope he will, but it has been a while since I sent him the email.

I removed the first link

Can you add something to the article from the second link.

I think we'd better leave it in the article anyway because it

has the picture. It is two of them right?

It's sad that pictures are this hard to get.

Does the article have the group member names correct?

--Easyas12c 19:08, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

D[h]ivehi?

moved to Talk:Dhivehi_language

bilingual babel boxes

User's language skills (see Babel):

et	Emakeel on eesti keel. Native speaker of Estonian.

en-3

Advanced level of English.

fi-2

Kohtalaisesti osaa suomea.

Intermediate level of Finnish.

es-1

Nivel básico de español.

Basic level of Spanish.

ru-1

начального уровня на русском языке.

Basic level of Russian.

Proposal: better(?) way :o) to implement Babel. (russian language box needs more fine tuning)

YES, this is a good idea, since the language everybody understands here is English. Otherwise, the Finnish language box might just be Hebrew... ;-) --Janke | Talk 21:19, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

...

pl:Szablon:Spoiler

Uwaga: W dalszej części artykułu znajdują się szczegóły fabuły lub zakończenia utworu.

UWAGA!

Interwikies

Hi,

Thanks for your comments. I am one of the interwiki bot developers. My recent code allowed the bot to fix all interwikies at once, as long as there is an account in that language. There I'm still (I'm sure) bugs lurking in the code, so any help is appreciated. Please leave them at my en: page. Thanks!

--Yurik 8 July 2005 18:25 (UTC)

I looked at the list you posted in the bug report, and it has some strange entries, such as roa-rup, bug, gay, etc. Where did you get them? There are no wikies like that (AFAIK). --Yurik 20:58, 9 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

First few words where this list is from. I made this list for my own interwiki sorter and it started after seeing Interwiki link sorter -tool (written in PHP). Seeing that this tool (at the time) didn't use full list of wikis, I decided to make similar one, but in JavaScript (faster) and "fix" the sorting on the way. I found the tool in Finnish wiki and there I found also list of all wikipedias: here (using this as base I've been updating mine on the way with info from different sources (meta, other wikis, etc.)). Now looking it over, you are right, some of the wikis doesn't exist ... yet :o): roa-rup: does, bug, gay not (these are proposed).

In my tool "homepage" is the same list with links and there can be seen which wikis exists at the moment, so we can see that in my list there's 5 extras. Extras doesn't influence work of my tool, as it's sorts only input (no checking), for wikibot the story is probably different and it's probably needed to remove from configuration.

Full list of existing wikis can be found in meta (meta:List of Wikipedias) as you probably know :o)

P.S: it's nice to see that you have updated your bot for work in Estonian wiki, but I have to point out that there is still few updates I'd be happy to see, (see [1]) namely Bahasa Indonesia is still in language code location, and Norsk (bokmål) is changed from no to nb (though wiki software corrects this on the fly) --TarmoK 08:26, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki sorting order

When talking with a vi: user, their order is simiar to et:. It can be merged into one. I guess that you are responsible to the order in et:. Please visit my talk page in meta and leave your opinion. -- ChongDae 19:29, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads-up: some new Wikipedia editions have been created; I've listed the new ones over at User talk:TarmoK/TKtools. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs, blog) 03:11, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What used to be be: has been moved to be-x-old:; be: is now home to the Normative Belarusian Wikipedia. At this point, both wikis have identical native names (perhaps "normative" and "alternative" need to be translated soon). I would list be-x-old: right under be: for the time being. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 06:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: thanks for updates

No problem. Actually, cbk-zam has just been changed to Zamboangueño, so it needs to be moved down now. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 03:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belarusian and Kabyle

Some additions for the interwiki sorter. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 05:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hakka

Even more additions for the interwiki sorter. (It's been down, by the way, but the port5 mirror is still up.) – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 02:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello TarmoK! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Olivia Merilahti - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stewards doing xwiki admin check

Hi TarmoK. Stewards are undertaking further works on inactive admins through the wikis, and I see that you are

admin at et.wikipedia.org
admin at et.wiktionary.org

at those wikis you have been inactive for many years. If you do not wish to maintain those rights, then they can be resigned at m:SRP; if you do wish to maintain those rights, it would help if you could do some editing on that wiki when we get to do formal notifications to those wikis. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:30, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TarmoK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]