Talk:Rear of the Year

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Check facts

Well publicised was; "Aside from a 1996 autobiography detailing the pain behind the last successful years of the band, little has been heard of the flaxen-haired original Rear of the Year. " From for ex: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreen (talk • contribs) 18:51, 4 April 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Request page protection for article

I have requested page protection for the article as Violetriga's unilateral reverting of my adding a balanced view is against policy. It is not allowed to revert such an edit, rather adding the balanced opposing view to an article is good policy. Also Violetriga has abused the 3 revert rule here and also broken the policy of starting an edit war rather than discussion. Kreen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreen (talk • contribs) 19:24, 4 April 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've examined the page history. Violetriga has reverted twice; how can this an abuse of the three revert rule? With regard to the article content, I agree with VioletRiga here, your addition is opinion/commentary, which is not appropriate here. — Matt Crypto 20:05, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Controversy

Article says "When Charlotte Church won in 2002 she was 16 (only just above the age of consent), leading to some controversy about the competition." Is this correct? Seems a bit OTT if it is. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 10:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is in fact true (e.g. this article from the Western Mail, this one from the BBC, which makes reference to this article from the Daily Mirror). As of this writing there isn't really a way to put it into the article without it taking up a disproportionate amount of space. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage

Lots of news coverage: [2]. I don't think notability can be questioned here.--Michig (talk) 06:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rear of the Year. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091005003634/http://www.anthonyedwardspublicity.com/aboutus.htm to http://www.anthonyedwardspublicity.com/aboutus.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]