Talk:Cleavage (breasts)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cleavage (breasts) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 45 days ![]() |
![]() | Cleavage (breasts) (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 16 December 2020 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Categories:
|
Only men like cleavage?
[edit]"In many cultures, though not all, men typically derive erotic pleasure from the visible display of cleavage." I don't know from personal experience (being a cis male) but I hear that lesbians and bi women also find cleavage attractive. One must also consider nonbinary people. IAmNitpicking (talk) 02:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- The article doesn't imply otherwise, but the size of the male population is much, much larger than those other groups, so that will have much more social consequences and it makes sense to focus on that. We also have to stick to what the sources say and emphasize matters in the way they do. Crossroads -talk- 03:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
This is another feminist derived article that likes to put men down for being men, I wish this would stop. ZL3XD (talk) 10:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Splitting proposal
[edit]In February 2021 an editor proposed that the section Cleavage (breasts)#Enhancement be split into a separate page called Cleavage enhancement. The discussion appears to have been archived at Talk:Cleavage (breasts)/Archive 2#Proposed splits: Resolving the article length problem without reaching consensus. However, the split notice remains in the article. I propose that we remove it. Polly Tunnel (talk) 12:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Done as no objections raised. Polly Tunnel (talk) 14:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
who's titties are these?
[edit]the headless photo at the top of the page is uncredited beyond that it is from flickr and without copyright. it is possible that the model might not want to have her titties on top of the Wikipedia page for cleavage. There is also a bit of an element of antisemitisim to the framing of this, as the picture is of her holding a text in hebrew, and farther down the page, there is a picture of a Muslim woman playing chess who is allowed both her modesty, and her identity.
Would it be possible for somebody to draw something? (perhaps a diagram, indicating what, exactly, is the cleavage) I realize this is a contentious topic. 38.103.136.34 (talk) 23:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what they actual issue is here. If a model isn't identifiable without credit then it stands to reason she wouldn't object as doing so she would have to identify herself going against the reason for her objection.
- I also don't know where the antisemitism comes from. I can't even make out the text let alone that it is Hebrew but maybe it just looks Hebrew because it is so garbled and out of focus. But assuming this is true there is an assumption that women want their modesty preserved when this is more a cultural prescript. In many countries that aren't Islamic you'll find a lot of Muslim women that don't follow these prescripts as well as Jewish women today blend in with the surrounding cultures and I've found a lot of them that will even be pictured naked so if they don't preserve their own modesty I can't see how the connection is made that it's antisemitic. Biofase flame| stalk 19:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class fashion articles
- Mid-importance fashion articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- B-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Mid-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- B-Class Pornography articles
- Low-importance Pornography articles
- B-Class Low-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles
- B-Class LGBT articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies articles
- B-Class Dietary supplement articles
- Low-importance Dietary supplement articles
- B-Class Health and fitness articles
- Low-importance Health and fitness articles
- WikiProject Health and fitness articles
- B-Class culture articles
- Low-importance culture articles
- WikiProject Culture articles