Jump to content

Talk:Artificial intelligence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 6, 2009Peer reviewReviewed

AI welfare

[edit]

I have added a sentence that Roman Yampolskiy and myself have coined the term "AI welfare" in 2019 and provided as reference the article where the term is coined, which you called "blatant self-promotion", which is certainly a blatant exaggeration. I rather believe it is inappropriate to discuss this topic in this Wikipedia article without referring to our paper. Instead of just deleting my sentence, I'd appreciate if you could be constructive, e.g. by adding this reference from your account, if I'm not allowed to do so. Thank you.

See the article: https://www.mdpi.com/2504-2289/3/1/2/htm Soenke2008 (talk) 17:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources should not be used to support that a term was 'coined', and in any event there is no indication that this neologism is relevant enough or widely used enough to be worth highlighting in this article. PS: MDPI appears on predatory publisher lists. MrOllie (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Engineering in the 21st Century - Section 003

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2024 and 3 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GroupScientificDiscovery (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Secure cyberspace 10.

— Assignment last updated by GroupScientificDiscovery (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Main article templates

[edit]

Shouldn't there be main article templates next to Natural language processing, Perception, General intelligence and other sectoins? Wiktorpyk (talk) 13:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not always clear which is better, a simple inline link or the "main article" template. No strong opinion here. Alenoach (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Define organizational performance 41.220.25.38 (talk) 02:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated content

[edit]

Many techniques have become outdated or less relevant with the onset of GPT models. Notably, the subsection "Knowledge representation" may be confusing about how modern AI works, and may need to be condensed. Alenoach (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add Human Resource in the Applications

[edit]

Add a new paragraph under Applications -- Games

[edit]

I propose adding the following content as a new paragraph to the "Games" subsection under "Applications":

AI is also being used in the creation and production of games. In 2023, the term "AI-Native games" was coined to describe a game where "GenAI is not just a feature but is fundamental to the game's existence and mechanism"[1]. One example is 1001 Nights[2], a creative narrative gameplay based on conversational AI, whose demo was released on Steam in October 2024[3]. The game's art assets are all created by human artists, and AI generates text content that interacts with the player in real-time[4]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.61.17.248 (talk) 10:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested Edit

[edit]

I propose adding the following content to the "Applications" section of this article:

"Artificial Intelligence is increasingly used in Human Resources for talent acquisition, employee engagement, and performance management. AI-powered tools help automate resume screening, predict employee attrition, and personalize employee training programs, improving efficiency and reducing human bias in decision-making."

Source: [McKinsey AI in Talent Management Report](https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/how-ai-is-changing-talent-management)

Rohan Mehra Rohanmehra13 (talk) 06:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification for 'In Fiction' Section

[edit]

It would be great if there could be a bit more in-depth clarification of how Shelley's Frankentstein relates to AI by drawing more parallel.

I also propose adding Donna Harraway's The Cyborg Manifesto to the section, which discusses a techno-utopian view of sentient machines from a feminist perspective. But clarification will need to be made that this isn't about AI, but a potential theoretical framework that could be applied to understanding humans' fear of machinery and proposed perspectives on exploring this fear. 148.252.141.194 (talk) 11:07, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citations under 'Ethics>Misinformation' Section

[edit]

Saw that citations were needed to support the text: "The AI program had correctly learned to maximize its goal, but the result was harmful to society. After the U.S. election in 2016, major technology companies took steps to mitigate the problem".

I found these two articles covering the topic and have checked on the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources page to confirm both as 'generally reliable' so inputting them here for consideration. The articles are from CNN and Financial Times.

Facebook, Twitter and Google failed to protect the 2016 election. Now they want to prove they’ve learned their lesson; World’s biggest tech companies pledge to fight AI-created election ‘deepfakes’ Miekeroni700 (talk) 12:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]