Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Noticeboard for India-related topics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 14 November 2011. |
Noticeboard for India-related topics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 26 December 2007. |
This page has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Article alerts for WikiProject India |
Did you know
Articles for deletion
Proposed deletions
Categories for discussion
Redirects for discussion
Files for discussion
Featured article candidates
Featured list candidates
Good article nominees
Good article reassessments
Requests for comments Peer reviews
Requested moves
Articles to be merged
Articles to be split
Articles for creation
|
This table is updated daily by a bot |
| ||||||||||||
|
Draft:Sanskrit epigraphy
[edit]Hi, all. I've gone about as far as I am able with Draft:Sanskrit epigraphy, so I leave it to you for improvement. The body of the draft is a copy of Sanskrit#Epigraphy with a lead stuck on top, so when released, the section at Sanskrit § Epigraphy should be chopped down to a summary, with a {{Main}} link in summary style. There are lots of images available at c:Category:Sanskrit inscriptions in India to make a gallery with. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind; I released it. Contributions still welcome. Mathglot (talk) 03:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Lakh and crore RFC
[edit]There is a RFC discussion on the use of lakh and crore at Wikipedia_talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#RfC Indian numbering conventions. Please make comments there, not here. Thank you. Stepho talk 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Interesting article but it’s been unsourced and unimproved almost 15 years. Please find and add references. Bearian (talk) 03:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
The article Tihawali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources online Google news, newspapers, books, or scholar. Run of the mill, very small village. Not enough information to merge. Can redirect if necessary.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 15:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Request for comments/help at WikiProj:Archaeology
[edit]Just asking for people interested in India-related topics for help or input at my discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Archaeology. Thanks. Tolozen (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Dal Lake has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Khandoba has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Criticism of the Pakistan Armed Forces
[edit]There is an active proposal to merge Criticism of the Pakistan Armed Forces into The Establishment (Pakistan). Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks. 109.204.231.244 (talk) 11:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Indian Institute of Management Rohtak
[edit]Indian Institute of Management Rohtak has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Ujjal Dosanjh
[edit]Ujjal Dosanjh has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:07, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello all! I'm in the process of making some pretty extensive edits to this article (mostly removing portfolio-esque content copied from LinkedIn), but need some additional sources for verification. My searches in English are turning up very few results. Any help getting this off the ground would be appreciated - thanks! jellyfish ✉ 23:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC)